+Author Affiliations
1Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia 2University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa 3University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada 4Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec City, QC, Canada 5Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil 6Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 7Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland 8Global Initiative for Asthma, Vancouver, WA, USA 9Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan 10Dept of Pediatrics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands11University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 12General Practitioner, London, UK 13Firestone Institute of Respiratory Health, St. Joseph’s Healthcare and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada 14University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy 15Pediatric Research Unit, University of Southern Denmark, Kolding Hospital, Kolding, Denmark 16Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, NUPAIVA Asthma Research Centre, Florianópolis, Brazil 17National Childreńs Hospital, University of Costa Rica San Jose, San Jose, Costa Rica 18Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA 19Dept of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 20Institute for Heart and Lung Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) has regularly published and annually updated a global strategy for asthma management and prevention that has formed the basis for many national guidelines. However, uptake of existing guidelines is poor. A major revision of the GINA report was published in 2014, and updated in 2015, reflecting an evolving understanding of heterogeneous airways disease, a broader evidence base, increasing interest in targeted treatment, and evidence about effective implementation approaches. During development of the report, the clinical utility of recommendations and strategies for their practical implementation were considered in parallel with the scientific evidence.
This article provides a summary of key changes in the GINA report, and their rationale. The changes include a revised asthma definition; tools for assessing symptom control and risk factors for adverse outcomes; expanded indications for inhaled corticosteroid therapy; a framework for targeted treatment based on phenotype, modifiable risk factors, patient preference, and practical issues; optimisation of medication effectiveness by addressing inhaler technique and adherence; revised recommendations about written asthma action plans; diagnosis and initial treatment of the asthma−chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome; diagnosis in wheezing pre-school children; and updated strategies for adaptation and implementation of GINA recommendations.
This Article
-
July 23, 2015 ERJ-00853-2015ERJ
- Free via Open Access: OA
- Free via Creative Commons:CC
- OA Full TextFree
- Full Text (PDF)Free
- Disclosures