J Clin Invest. 2016. doi:10.1172/JCI85664.
Claire Mesnil,1,2 Stéfanie Raulier,1 Geneviève Paulissen,1 Xue Xiao,2,3 Mark A. Birrell,4Dimitri Pirottin,1,2 Thibaut Janss,1 Philipp Starkl,5 Eve Ramery,2 Monique Henket,6,7Florence N. Schleich,6,7 Marc Radermecker,8 Kris Thielemans,9 Laurent Gillet,2,3 Marc Thiry,10 Maria G. Belvisi,4 Renaud Louis,6,7 Christophe Desmet,1,2 Thomas Marichal,1,2 and Fabrice Bureau1,2,11
See the related Commentary A hidden residential cell in the lung.
- Abstract
Increases in eosinophil numbers are associated with infection and allergic diseases, including asthma, but there is also evidence that eosinophils contribute to homeostatic immune processes. In mice, the normal lung contains resident eosinophils (rEos), but their function has not been characterized. Here, we have reported that steady-state pulmonary rEos are IL-5–independent parenchymal Siglec-FintCD62L+CD101lo cells with a ring-shaped nucleus. During house dust mite–induced airway allergy, rEos features remained unchanged, and rEos were accompanied by recruited inflammatory eosinophils (iEos), which were defined as IL-5–dependent peribronchial Siglec-FhiCD62L–CD101hi cells with a segmented nucleus. Gene expression analyses revealed a more regulatory profile for rEos than for iEos, and correspondingly, mice lacking lung rEos showed an increase in Th2 cell responses to inhaled allergens. Such elevation of Th2 responses was linked to the ability of rEos, but not iEos, to inhibit the maturation, and therefore the pro-Th2 function, of allergen-loaded DCs. Finally, we determined that the parenchymal rEos found in nonasthmatic human lungs (Siglec-8+CD62L+IL-3Rlo cells) were phenotypically distinct from the iEos isolated from the sputa of eosinophilic asthmatic patients (Siglec-8+CD62LloIL-3Rhi cells), suggesting that our findings in mice are relevant to humans. In conclusion, our data define lung rEos as a distinct eosinophil subset with key homeostatic functions.
Article tools