September–October, 2016 Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 835–846
on behalf of the Respiratory Effectiveness Group
Article Outline
- The Role of Primary Health Care Professionals in Optimizing Adherence
- Structured assessment in consultations
- Concordance and shared treatment goals
- Effective health care professional communication
- Engaging with medication beliefs of patients
- Patient-centered approaches to supporting adherence
- Tailoring consultation style toward patient preferences and shared decision making
- Role of the community pharmacist
- Specific pharmacy tools
- Primary Care–Based Adherence Interventions in Asthma and COPD
- Role of the Health Care System in Optimizing Medication Adherence
- Cost-Effectiveness
- Conclusions
- References
Adherence to medication comprises a multiphased temporal process involving (1) initiation of prescribed therapy, (2) implementation as prescribed, and (3) subsequent persistence. Medication adherence remains suboptimal in most patients with long-term respiratory conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Interventions have been shown to effectively improve treatment initiation, implementation, and persistence when delivered at the health care professional level or the system level, but demonstration of the cost-effectiveness of these interventions is necessary to ensure their widespread use. This review summarizes how health care professionals can intervene to improve medication adherence in patients with asthma and COPD, provides some examples of effective primary care interventions, and illustrates some of the challenges to optimal implementation arising from cost-effectiveness modeling. Improving adherence is shown to be an economically viable treatment option for patients with asthma and COPD, but there are differences in the health economics pertaining to each condition and setting that can affect whether an intervention is considered cost-effective. Targeting adherence interventions at patients with the greatest to gain, and tailoring them to individual patient needs, may help to optimize cost-effectiveness ratios and improve the probability of positive reimbursement decisions, systemwide implementation, and resultant health benefits.